Indefinite detention of civilians in accordance with an undeclared or undisclosed martial law process under NDAA is a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER, DIRECT THREAT, and ILLEGAL act of government in violation of the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th Amendments to the Constitution. When government oversteps its bounds so egregiously and has the power to enforce such unconstitutional acts by means of military force to back it up, the message to the people is unmistakable: the Constitution has been abrogated or nullified.
Assuming the Constitution is now null and void given the numerous and persistent violations by the government of every provision of the Bill of Rights except the 3rd Amendment to the Constitution, isn't that the de facto equivalent of no Constitution?
The US Constitution is the basis of our government. Without it, we have no authorized government. If the Constitution is now null and void because government ignores it, then the authority of those in power to rule over us must necessarily be null and void also. They cannot claim authority to rule over us by virtue of the Constitution that gives them that power and authority and at the same time violate every provision and amendment of that Constitution that is our foundation of government.
No comments:
Post a Comment